Culture Makes Better Future Essay

Culture is sort of like history or evolution. stack make the mistake of assuming history has a purpose or that evolution has a purpose. But in reality, history is equitable an aggregate of facts and opinions nearly the past. History, or the march of civilization, has no direction, no goal. Yes, we seem to be improving ourselves by certain metrics but that isnt an a priori requirement. Evolution is likewise not striving towards any particular direction. We are not at the cutting edge of evolution in any feel.If in a one million million million years, the organism that empennage survive on Earth best is an amoeba, then amoebae will be the dominant species on the planet. Its not a bump or worse situation (except maybe for us), it just is. Similarly it is not socialisations job to create a better future. What does better rase mean? Better for whom? At what cost for other entities? I imagine some cultures king like to take things slow and enjoy life, while others might believe in long work hours and competitiveness. Whos the arbiter of better or worse here?Some culture might devalue women to the finis that it loses too many of them and isnt able to effectively propagate itself, effectively dying out. Im sure people from that culture wouldnt be happy about that, although its good in some universal sense. Culture exists to propagate itself, not to do any good or problematical for the people who follow it. My thoughts here are more or less para-phrasings of the discussion on memes from The Selfish Gene. Culture at best, creates a sense of touch of societal cohesion, a generalized patriotism that rouse compel its members to perform better against other cultures.I dont think it makes any sense in asking if culture is good for youth and country because that assumes that there is an alternative to culture, a state of diminished culture, or non-culture. Thats not acquittance to happen ever. Culture doesnt allow a vacuum to exist something always rushes in to take up the empty space. You might mean rather mean to ask about the importance of a countrys indigenous culture for that countrys progress, in the context of foreign culture having undesired influences. To that I say, let the fittest survive.I dont believe in feeling guilty or upset about, for example, Indian culture fitting westernized. If a culture is strong enough, itll adapt itself to new challenges. If not, too bad. Just like there have been millions of species that are now extinct, and also millions more than can arise given the appropriate conditions on Earth culture, like life, will always be around in some form or the other. And just like you cant say that any particular bird or animal or virus is better for nature, you really just cant discuss how culture is better for our future.