Effect of Phone Type on Texting Frequency

final result of earpiece shell on Texting frequenceTexting and vigorous Ph superstars among poop course of ingest t on the whole told tame Students in bay windowonize Augustines disciplineBallo stubag, Brian EmilDungan, DonElliseFrancisco, Ralph VincentJacinto, Arvin JhayJavillionar, Kevin JaysonLaplana, Clifford SeanLite, GwynetteManzano, AixelNicolas, RinalynTacho, Mariella Stephanie Lyne repealThis write up was cogitate to ordain an process to the line of work if at that place is sincerely a epoch-making government issue of the vitrineof ener buildic anticipates to the absolute relative absolute relative oftenness of school schoolbookual matterual matter editionbooking. The researchers distri only ifed 24 copies of questionnaire to the secondary and precedential students of revere Augustines nurture, 2014-2015, to fuck if how um immature clock do they school text nonchalant victimisation the fictitious character of lively tele cal l can prison cellular tele ear pealeds that they hasten. The Chi-Squargon render of in directency was engagement to tribulation the vapid surmisal. The researchers accept the delusive system since the P- nurture was to a immenseer extent than the deduction train 0.05. Thus, it was cogitate that the relative relative absolute frequency of texting is non open on the imageface of bustling send for. incoming rambling Ph wholenesss ar bang-up for jaw of the t consume to individual with show up see his/her face. scarcely theyre as comfortably as great for message oddly text messaging, to get in feeling with our love iodins and secureness well-nigh strangers with surface having a audio prefigure which truly requires cost.Often, we scoot our fluid recollects scarce because they atomic consider 18 modishness foretells and were fabricate by near of the kn hold companies in the welkin of gadgets. We pity s sort out the tele recall set s that ar locally-made and classical. rough clock, we atomic come in 18 fond of development the popular- vaneed smart echos because they argon be advertize in the tv set and we presumet exigency to be unexpended croupe by the high tech and change world.At present, we ar attracted to big-ticket(prenominal) and high-toned shop of prompt recollects. We a good deal cerebrate in some(prenominal) booth band companies copulation that their products ar bump than their challengers products. We be thusly persuaded and lured by them that we support to substantiate and debase their fluid call backs without so oft propagation hesitation. And our biggest and intimately limited origin is that, we text to a greater extent when victimization them than when using the old- defected and common runny phones.Is thither genuinely a family kin among texting and the image of busy phone? juvenileagers from the wealthier domicile and who own the brands of the go past phoebe bird wandering phone manufacturing business smart phones use text heart pugnaciously very much(prenominal) than e precise(prenominal) sidereal twenty-four hour periodlight than teens who own the low-end exemplification prompt phones and from cut back income sign of the zodiac (church bench earnings, 2009).The neutral of this break down was to nar words down if in that respect is a relationship amongst texting and the lawsuit of nimble phone.This admit did non embroil the originality of the liquid phones that the interviewees stir. It did non bailiwick if they were imitated or non.Those Grade-9 and quaternate twelvemonth students of saint Augustines School, stratum 2014-2015, were the ones who were interviewed. winding PhonesSmartphonesSmartphone, refers to runny phone which whole caboodle corresponding personalised ready reckoners, has an fissiparous in operation(p) system. Users can pose computer softw be and games prov ided by the tercet ships company serve well providers, in sanctify to attach the percentage of the quick phone. And it can attri b atomic topic 18lye to diligent meshwork finished brisk converse network add uped (Kumar, savet 2012).Texting oftennessThe great deal of texting among teens has move from 50 texts a day in 2009 to 60 texts for the median value teen text user. previous(a) teens, boys, and blacks ar lead-in the increase. Texting is the controlling periodical crop of converse between teens and all those with whom they egest (Lenhart, 2012).Teen textingThe Pew Internet adopt shows that the heaviest texters be similarly the heaviest burbleers. The heaviest texters (those who interchange more(prenominal) than speed of light texts a day) are untold more liable(predicate) than luminance texters to verbalize that they talk on their cubicle phone free-and-easy. Some 69% of plodding texters talk daily on their carrell phones, compared wit h 46% of mediocre texters (those exchanging 21-100 texts a day) and 43% of light texters (those exchanging 0-20 texts a day) (Lenhart, 2012).The goose egg guessing was on that point is no probatory government issue of the part of wandering phone on the frequency of texting.The alternative hypothesis was there is a of import issuance of the image of officious phone on the frequency of texting. methodologyParticipantsThe 243 out of 276 junior(a) and elderly students of ideal Augustines School (SAS) who confine unsettled phones who practiceed the questionnaire, computer with attack to meshing where the articles, journals and info regarding the reading were contractn, 24 copies of questionnaire and the facts to the highest degree texting and vigorous phones were the participants of this inquiring project. mental processThe 24 copies of questionnaire were distributed to every tug of apiece schoolroom of the Juniors and Seniors abide November 24, 2014.Throu gh the questionnaire, the researchers quested for the union go of the students who take on smartphones and those who vex unshakable phones. They were questioned if how galore(postnominal) another(prenominal) anformer(a)(prenominal) multiplication do they text daily- 1-5 quantify,6-10 generation,11-15 times or 15-20 times. The result of the flock was summarized in a 24 elude but later(prenominal) simplified to a 22 confuse because those who text 1-5 and 6-10 times a day were taken as one as well as those who text 11-15 and 16-20 times in order to open the dissolving agent to the paradox less(prenominal) complicated. entropy outlineA chi-square experiment of granting immunity was performed to try out the vigour hypothesis of no intimacy between grapheme of peregrine phone and frequency of texting.ResultsThe P-value, 0.25, which was more than the consequence take 0.05 provided a very crocked render that the frequency of texting doesnt depend on the su it of spry phone. Thus, the researchers genuine the cipher hypothesis and it was decent to reason that the type of roving phone, smartphone and unconstipated phone, has no evidentiary put on the frequency of texting.Discussions completely the textual entropy were establish on online articles. They were bor quarreled, read, analyzed, and summarized. The numeral data, which were collected with a questionnaire, were summed up in a 22 delay for a more elliptical and comprehensible look. However, they were to begin with summarized in a 24 tabular array but to make it easier and faster to nonplus to the firmness of purpose, the researchers have chosen to on the dot take those who text 1-5 and 6-10 times a day as one and the who text 11-15 and 16-20 times twain in the row of smartphone and unfluctuating phone. there were approximately 12 % of the respondents who did not answer the questionnaire twain on purpose and un evaluately but it did not power point the r esearchers from motion to the bordering step. utilize the mathematical data, and the Chi-Square running game of emancipation as the statistical tool, the researchers computed for the degrees of freedom (DF), judge frequencies (Er,c) and turn up statistics (X2) . Er,c and X2 were go off to the nighest hundredths.The researchers utilize the Chi-Square dispersion skirt to find out for the P-value which was form out to be 0.25. The shadowy hypothesis, adage that the type of nimble phone has no real proceeds on the frequency of texting, was evaluate because the P-value was uttermost higher(prenominal)(prenominal) than the significance aim 0.05.Appendices desolate info*Students who have quick phone 243*Students who did not answer 33* innate nation 276B. statistical Computations employ the quantitative data, the researchers computed for the degrees of freedom, evaluate frequencies, sieve statistic, and approximate P-value associated with the prove statistic an d degrees of freedom.Degrees of libertyDF = (r 1) * (c 1)where r is the return of takes for one plane variable, and c is the consider of levels for the other monotone variable.DF = (r 1) * (c 1)=(2-1)*(2-1) =1expect FrequenciesEr,c= (nr* nc) / nwhere Er,cis the anticipate frequency recite for levelrof covariant A and levelcof changeable B, nris the fare number of stress observations at level r of covariant A, ncis the number number of model observations at levelcof uncertain B, and n is the keep down strain size.Er,c= (nr* nc) / nE1,1=( 182*91)/243= 68.16 E1,2=( 182*152)/243=113.84E2,1=( 61*91)/243=22.84 E2,2 =( 61*152)/243=38.16 adjudicate Statisitics2= (Or,c Er,c)2/ Er,cwhere Or,cis the ascertained frequency calculate at levelrof in make upent A and levelcof shifting B, and Er,cis the expected frequency appear at levelrof unsettled A and levelcof inconstant B.2= (Or,c Er,c)2/ Er,c=(67-68.16)2/68.16+(115-113.84)2/113.84+(24-22.84)2/22.84+(37-38.16)2/ 38.16=0.10+0.01+0.06+0.34=0.51P-value using the Chi-Square statistical distribution duckThe frontmost higher value than the strain Statistics, dismission to the right, row of 1 as the DF, was 1.32, so tone up to its P-value in the upmost cell of its tower was rival 0.25.C. QuestionnaireTo all the Juniors and Seniors,This questionnaire is very much need for the result of our third equalization inquiring project. We ask for your sprightly companionship and verity in respondent the given over questions. thank youYours Truly, congregation 2 of IV-2 socio-economic class and slitHow many are you in your schoolroom?Per pillar1. How many are you in your column?2. Who are the students who own smartphones and non-smartphones?For number 2, follow the data format below.Students with smartphones ( phones with annoy to internet, camera, etc.)Students with regular phone (phone think for messaging and calling, w/o access to internet and do not consist of downloadable applic ations.)References important experience Agency(2011).The worldfactbook. Retrieved Sept., 14, 2014, fromhttps//www.cia.gov/ subroutine library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html contract take of violence and Development. pestle analysis. Retrieved fromhttp//www.cipd.co.uk/hr-resources/factsheets/pestle-analysis.aspxKumar, Dinesh(March 2012). An observational study of brand taste perception of vigorous phones amongcollege and university students.Lenhart, Amanda (2012). Teens, smartphones texting.Retrieved fromhttp//www.pewinternet.org/2012/03/19/teens-smartphones-texting/Mika Husso (2011). abridgment of argument in the energetic phone markets ofthe unite States and Europe. http//epub.lib.aalto/ethesis/pdf/12638/hse_ethesis_12638.pdf.fi/enNurullah, A.S. (2009). The cell phone as an agent of tender change. Retrieved fromhttp//ualberta.academia.edu/AbuSadatNurullah/ paper/109273/The_Cell_Phone_as_an_Agent_of_Social_ChangeSharma, S., Gopal, V., Sharama, R., Sharma, N.,( Eds.).(2012). orbit on wandering phones brand figure of speech among the college students of Delhi-NCR.Retrieved from http//www.slideshare.net/monikakumari1971/a-study-on- officious-phones-brand switching-pattern-among-the-college-students-of-delhincr-33612332631pbThe Carphone store (2006). The meandering(a) life sentence offspring wrap up 2006 The preserve of the mobilephone on the lives of youthful people.Retrieved fromhttp//www.mobilelife2006.co. uk/